Rabo is bokononist (21st of February 2011)

How many of stupid and hard-headed "discussions" on relation of science and religion have I heard, especially in recent times? Too many.
One should be cautious when using words "discussion" and "dialogue". These words do not at all fit to some forms of
conversation. I had a misfortune to know a type of extraordinarily selfish people of flat voice who, in their years of
being on this planet, learned to falsify a "civilized discussion". Their idea of "civilized discussion" consists of
speaking about something in flat intonation, with a calm facial expression and robotic movements. This is the most important
characteristic of being civilized. OK. Perhaps I could agree on a certain superiority of that form, but let us not lose from
sight the basic condition required to call something a dialog: empathy.
And regardless of emotional and vigorous way that often characterizes my discussions, so that I do not fit in their
definition of "civilized", I have an elementary precondition for discussion: I can feel concern and pain of an animal, and
especially of other human being. Emotional invalids and selfish manipulators cannot.
I have really seen a lot of such emotional invalids and selfish manipulators when it comes to "discussions" regarding
relation of science and religion. And I am really sick of it, because those types of people usually lead each of the
"sides" in the "discussions".
I am sorry for the dogmatism of certain people from my profession (science). Exactly that is the reason of decline of all
religions - dogmatism, and emotional invalids are trying to make science one of dogmatic disciplines. And please don't ask me
what is the relation of emotions to science. Of course there is a relation, because science is not an activity separated from
humans. Science is human endeavour and is therefore certainly in some relation to emotions.
I can suppose that something that is good for me may be completely inadequate for someone else. That is completely reasonable
assumption and the other guy should have his freedom of thinking differently, as long as it does not hurt anyone else.
Of course, when we start talking about raising
and educating children, the story changes. I am here speaking about equals, that are, both by their age and
intelligence, free to choose their worldview.
It is a bit silly for me to further elaborate my attitude because I've written it down in a very detailed (but short) manner
in Problem of the observer, so if you'd like to read more about it ... You will have to learn
Croatian, however.
For all those that can at the same time play with different perspectives regarding relation of science and religion, here is
material for thought that I definitely recommend:
- "Man on the Moon", a movie by Miloš Forman.
- First two-three chapters from "Master and Margarita" by Bulgakov.
- Novels by Dostoyevsky, especially "The Grand Inquisitor" from "Brothers Karamazov".
- Music by Vivaldi and Bach, especially Vivaldi's "Gloria" and "Nisi Dominus" (RV 608), "Cum dederit".
- "American" IV and V albums by Johnny Cash.
- "Stranger", by Albert Camus.
- "Problem of the observer", by me, Antonio Šiber. Only in Croatian, I am afraid. I am really shockingly pretentious...
- "Cat's Cradle", by Kurt Vonnegut.
"Cat's Cradle" is a new addition to this "must comprehend" list, but certainly very important and original addition. That novel was so important for Rabo Karabekian that during one visit to Pula, where I had the opportunity to make his portrait, he told me that he converted to bokononism, the religion that he just got to know from "Cat's Cradle" by Kurt Vonnegut. And here is what Bokonon, the prophet of bokononism, says about emotionally invalid, "learned" people.
Bokonon says how God created the world and man in it (he says of his first book: "Of course it's trash"):
"Everything must have a purpose?" asked God.
"Certainly," said man.
"Then I leave it to you to think of one for all this," said God. And He went away.
There is much more that I cite in the Croatian version of this page, but for those of you that want to know more, there is also >> a page dedicated to Bokononism where you can learn a lot more.
"Cat's Cradle" is definitely a must read !
| << Swifts in Dubrovnik | Buildings which eat people >> |
Last updated on 21st of February 2011.